Services
Web Development
Custom web platforms in Python, PHP and Node.js with Vue or React front ends — portals, SaaS products, marketplaces, e-commerce and internal tools.
What do we build?
We build custom web platforms that a business actually runs on: SaaS products, customer and partner portals, marketplaces and e-commerce, internal tools, and modernisation of legacy systems without stopping the business. Back ends in Python, PHP or Node.js, front ends in Vue or React with TypeScript. The tools are mainstream by design: JavaScript has been the most used language in the Stack Overflow Developer Survey for over a decade, with Python and TypeScript close behind (Stack Overflow, 2024), so the team that maintains the system after us will not struggle to hire.
- SaaS products — multi-tenant architecture, billing, roles, public APIs.
- Customer and partner portals — self-service, documents, orders, support.
- Marketplaces and e-commerce — catalogue, search, checkout, payments, logistics integrations.
- Internal tools and admin systems — the software your operations actually run on.
- Modernisation — moving legacy PHP/Python systems to a maintainable stack without stopping the business.
Which stack do we use?
We choose the stack for the job and for the team that will maintain it after us — not for fashion. Back end: Python (FastAPI, Django), PHP (Laravel, Symfony), Node.js (NestJS). Front end: Vue 3, Nuxt, React, Next.js, TypeScript, Tailwind. Data: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, Elasticsearch. Infra: Docker, Kubernetes, AWS/GCP/Azure, CI/CD, infrastructure as code. Public-facing products get a performance budget tied to Google's Core Web Vitals thresholds — LCP under 2.5 s, INP under 200 ms, CLS under 0.1 (web.dev, 2024) — because those numbers feed both ranking and conversion.
SPA vs SSR: which rendering model fits your product?
For a logged-in application (dashboard, admin, portal) a single-page app is the simpler and cheaper choice; for anything that needs to be found and load fast on first visit — shop, marketplace, marketing pages — server-side rendering or a hybrid framework such as Nuxt or Next.js wins. Google's guidance is the same: render on the server when first paint and crawlability matter, hydrate on the client for interactivity (web.dev, 2024).
| Criterion | SPA (client rendering) | SSR / hybrid (Nuxt, Next.js) |
|---|---|---|
| First load | Blank until JS downloads and runs | HTML arrives rendered; faster LCP |
| SEO and sharing | Depends on crawler executing JS | Full HTML for crawlers and link previews |
| Best for | Logged-in apps, dashboards, admin tools | Public catalogues, content, e-commerce |
| Infrastructure | Static hosting + API | Node runtime or edge; more to operate |
| Complexity | Lower; one runtime | Higher; server and client code paths |
| Our default | Vue 3 / React SPA | Nuxt / Next.js with per-route choice |
How do we deliver?
We deliver in two-week increments from a written scope with acceptance criteria: discovery first, then an MVP you can put in front of users in weeks, then a roadmap. Tests, code review, CI/CD and monitoring exist from the first sprint, not after launch. The measurable effect of that discipline is documented by the DORA research programme: teams with the strongest delivery practices deploy far more often and recover from failures far faster than low performers (DORA, 2024). After launch: support and development under an SLA.
How do we ensure quality and security?
Quality and security are built into the pipeline: automated tests, static analysis, dependency scanning, OWASP-aware reviews, encryption in transit and at rest, audit logs and GDPR-ready data handling. Access control gets special attention because it is the most common web weakness — OWASP found some form of broken access control in 94% of applications it analysed (OWASP, 2021). For products handling payments or personal data we add threat modelling and a penetration test before launch, and we keep to performance budgets for public pages: Google reports that even a 0.1 s improvement in load time measurably raises retail conversion rates (web.dev, 2023).
Frequently asked questions
Case studies
Related case studies
KLR.gg: automated CS2 match analytics for private lobbies
A platform that pulls server logs, match stats and demo recordings from Counter-Strike 2 community servers automatically, scores every duel and round, and turns them into player ratings, trends and balanced teams — no uploads, no spreadsheets.
- Gaming · Esports analytics
- Python
- pandas
- FastAPI
Erudil: an AI engine that prices every match outcome
Our own product. A probability engine turns match data into outcome probability matrices, compares them with bookmaker odds, and publishes a tamper-proof track record of every pick — wins and losses alike.
- Sports analytics
- Python
- PyTorch
- PostgreSQL
AI knowledge assistants for a 30 000-employee grocery chain
Three RAG assistants on one platform — for commercial staff, store directors (by voice, from the shop floor) and HR — answer questions from corporate regulations with a citation to the exact clause, or say honestly that they do not know — so staff stop phoning head office for routine questions.
- Retail
- Python
- LangChain
- PostgreSQL + pgvector
Insights
Related articles
AI & Machine Learning
Why Hybrid Search Beat Pure Embeddings in Our Invoice AI Pipeline
Pure dense embeddings failed on alphanumeric serial numbers in our Invoice AI pipeline. Combining PostgreSQL tsvector full-text search with pgvector cosine distance lifted top-1 matching accuracy from 61.4% to 94.8%.
AI & Machine Learning
Why pgvector Replaced Qdrant in Our LLM Feedback Pipeline
We migrated 5 million vector embeddings from a standalone Qdrant cluster to PostgreSQL 16 with pgvector 0.7. Here is how operational overhead dropped while maintaining sub-50 ms search latencies.
AI & Machine Learning
How AI agents work: the architecture of a production agent
An agent is a model wrapped in perception, memory, tools, orchestration and monitoring. A practical walk through the six layers, what breaks in each one, and what we do about it.