Services
Mobile Development
Cross-platform apps in Flutter and React Native, native Swift and Kotlin where it matters — sharing one back end with your web product.
What do we build?
We build mobile apps that share one back end with your web product: customer apps for e-commerce, services, fintech and loyalty; field and workforce apps that work offline; companion apps for SaaS and IoT; and apps with on-device or cloud AI. Cross-platform in Flutter or React Native by default, native Swift and Kotlin where the platform demands it. Mobile is where most of your users already are: Statista reports that mobile devices generate roughly 60% of global website traffic (Statista, 2024), so the app is rarely a side channel.
- Customer apps for e-commerce, services, fintech and loyalty programmes.
- Field and workforce apps: offline-first, barcode/QR, photos, geolocation, signatures.
- Companion apps for SaaS and IoT products.
- Apps with on-device or cloud AI: recognition, recommendations, assistants.
Native vs cross-platform: which should you choose?
Choose cross-platform (Flutter or React Native) when one codebase can serve both stores without compromise — which is most business apps. Choose native (Swift, Kotlin) when the app leans on camera pipelines, Bluetooth, background processing, heavy graphics or performance-critical screens. Both frameworks compile to real native UI or bridge to it, and both are documented and supported by Google and Meta respectively (Flutter docs, 2025; React Native docs, 2025).
| Criterion | Cross-platform (Flutter, React Native) | Native (Swift, Kotlin) |
|---|---|---|
| Codebases | One for iOS and Android | Two, one per platform |
| Time and cost to first release | Lower; shared UI and logic | Higher; features built twice |
| Platform features | Most via plugins; edge cases need native modules | Full, immediate access to new OS APIs |
| Performance | Good for typical business UI | Best for graphics, media, background work |
| Team | One mobile team plus web skills reuse | Two platform specialists |
| Our recommendation | Default for most products | When discovery shows a hard platform dependency |
How do we choose the approach?
We recommend the approach in discovery based on your product, not on what we prefer to write. Cross-platform first when one codebase serves both stores without compromise; native for camera, Bluetooth, background processing and performance-critical screens. One back end shared with the web product, API contracts agreed up front, offline sync where connectivity is unreliable. Both frameworks are well established: Flutter and React Native are the two most used cross-platform mobile frameworks among professional developers in the Stack Overflow survey (Stack Overflow, 2024).
How do we release and operate the app?
We handle the whole release path: App Store and Google Play publishing, review handling, staged rollouts, crash monitoring, analytics, push notifications, deep links and in-app purchases, then post-release support and OS-version upgrades under an SLA. Store review is part of the plan, not a surprise — Apple publishes its App Store Review Guidelines and rejects apps that break them (Apple, 2025). Security follows the OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (OWASP MASVS 2.0, 2023): secure storage and transport, token-based auth, minimal permissions, and a mobile penetration test before release for apps handling payments, health or personal data.
Frequently asked questions
Case studies
Related case studies
Insights
Related articles
Mobile
Fixing Android ANRs: How SQLite WAL Rescued Our Mobile App
Switching from SQLite default rollback journal mode to Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) and tuning Room database connection pools eliminated UI thread blocks across our fleet of 50,000 active devices.
Mobile
Why Bridge Serialization Forced Our Mobile App Rewrite to Native Swift
Streaming 100Hz BLE telemetry through React Native's legacy bridge saturated the event loop, forcing a complete rewrite to native Swift.
Cloud, DevOps & High-load
Why We Left AWS Aurora PostgreSQL for Managed Bare Metal to Save 58%
Migrating a high-throughput 12TB PostgreSQL database off AWS Aurora reduced our monthly bill by 58%. Here is the technical breakdown of our storage I/O costs and cutover strategy.