Services
Cybersecurity & AI Security
Penetration testing and vulnerability assessment of web, mobile, API and cloud systems; security testing of LLM applications and AI agents; secure development and compliance readiness.
Services
Cybersecurity & AI Security
Penetration Testing & Vulnerability Assessment
Manual penetration testing of web applications, APIs, mobile apps, cloud and network infrastructure by senior engineers — OWASP/PTES methodology, CVSS-scored report, retest and attestation letter.
Learn More →
AI & LLM Security: Red Teaming and Assessment
Security testing of chatbots, RAG systems and AI agents against the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications — prompt injection, data leakage, excessive agency, supply chain — plus guardrails and monitoring that hold in production.
Learn More →
Secure Development, DevSecOps & Compliance Readiness
Security code review, threat modelling, DevSecOps pipelines and cloud hardening — plus readiness assessments and technical controls for GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, DORA and NIS2.
Learn More →
Why security from people who build systems?
Our security work is done by engineers who write production code, not by a scanner with a PDF export. We have spent 16 years building and operating web, mobile, cloud and AI systems, so when we test one we know where it breaks, and every finding comes with a reproduction, a severity based on real exploitability and a fix that fits your stack. The stakes are documented: the global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million, the highest on record (IBM, 2024).
We work in three areas — and they fit together into one programme when you need it:
- Penetration testing & vulnerability assessment — web applications, APIs, mobile apps, cloud and network infrastructure, against OWASP and PTES methodology.
- AI & LLM security — red teaming of chatbots, RAG systems and AI agents against the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications: prompt injection, data leakage, excessive agency, supply chain.
- Secure development & compliance — code review, DevSecOps pipelines, threat modelling, and readiness for GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2 and sector rules.
What do you get?
You get a report you can act on, a retest, an attestation letter and no disruption to the business. Each finding carries a CVSS score, proof of exploitation and a remediation plan; after you fix, we verify and issue a letter you can show to customers, auditors and partners. That letter matters more each year: Verizon found that third-party involvement in breaches doubled to about 30% (Verizon, 2025), which is why your customers now ask for your security evidence.
- A report you can act on: executive summary for management, technical detail for engineers, each finding with CVSS score, proof of exploitation and a remediation plan.
- Retest included. After you fix, we verify and issue an attestation letter you can show to customers, auditors and partners.
- No disruption: scope, rules of engagement, test windows and emergency contacts are agreed in writing before the first packet is sent.
- Confidentiality: NDA before scoping, findings shared only over agreed channels, all test data deleted at the end of the engagement.
In-house security team vs external partner: which do you need?
Most product companies need a small in-house owner of security plus an external partner for testing and specialist work — not one or the other. An external tester brings an attacker's fresh eyes and independence that auditors and customers expect; an internal owner keeps fixes moving between engagements. Hiring the full skill set is hard: ISC2 estimates the global cybersecurity workforce gap at about 4.8 million people (ISC2, 2024).
| Criterion | In-house team | External partner (Glanit) |
|---|---|---|
| Independence | Tests own work; auditors may want a third party | Independent findings and attestation letter |
| Breadth of skills | Limited by headcount | Web, mobile, cloud, AI/LLM, compliance on demand |
| Cost model | Fixed salaries regardless of workload | Per engagement or monthly retainer |
| Continuity | Always available, knows the system | Scheduled tests plus embedded engineer option |
| Best for | Day-to-day vulnerability management | Pentests, AI red teaming, audit readiness |
| Our recommendation | One internal owner | Plus annual tests and specialist work from us |
When should you bring us in?
Bring us in before a launch or a major release, before a customer, partner or investor security questionnaire, after a suspicious incident, when you put an LLM or AI agent in front of customers, or when a compliance deadline is approaching. Deadlines are concrete: GDPR requires notifying the supervisory authority within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal-data breach (GDPR Art. 33, 2016), and NIS2 extends incident-reporting and risk-management duties to many more sectors, with an early warning due within 24 hours (EU, 2022). Or simply on a schedule — annually, or after every significant change.
How does an engagement run?
An engagement runs in four steps — scoping, testing, report and debrief, retest and attestation — over one to five weeks depending on scope. The cadence we recommend matches what regulators already require: PCI DSS v4.0, for example, calls for a penetration test at least annually and after significant changes (PCI SSC, 2024).
Scoping (a few days). Assets, test type (black/grey/white box), constraints, success criteria, rules of engagement.
Testing (1–4 weeks). Automated discovery plus manual exploitation by senior engineers; critical findings reported the same day.
Report and debrief. Written report, a call with your engineers, a prioritised fix plan.
Retest and attestation. We verify fixes and issue a letter of attestation. Ongoing: recurring tests, vulnerability management, or a security engineer inside your team.
Read how we handle your data on our Security & Compliance page, or request a security assessment.
Frequently asked questions
Case studies
Related case studies
Erudil: an AI engine that prices every match outcome
Our own product. A probability engine turns match data into outcome probability matrices, compares them with bookmaker odds, and publishes a tamper-proof track record of every pick — wins and losses alike.
- Sports analytics
- Python
- PyTorch
- PostgreSQL
AI knowledge assistants for a 30 000-employee grocery chain
Three RAG assistants on one platform — for commercial staff, store directors (by voice, from the shop floor) and HR — answer questions from corporate regulations with a citation to the exact clause, or say honestly that they do not know — so staff stop phoning head office for routine questions.
- Retail
- Python
- LangChain
- PostgreSQL + pgvector
Document AI that reads 1 300 supplier invoices a day
Scans and photos of invoices, delivery notes and acts go through a multimodal model that extracts typed fields with a confidence score per field, reconciles them with the supplier and contract master data, and posts to the ERP. Only low-confidence documents reach a human — roughly one in nine.
- Retail · Finance
- Python
- PyTorch
- Multimodal LLM
Insights
Related articles
Security
OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications, explained for people who ship them
The 2025 list names ten ways an LLM app gets attacked. Here is what each one looks like in a real chatbot, RAG system or agent — and the fix we apply in production.
Security
Penetration test or vulnerability scan: which one to order, and when
Customers ask for a "pentest" and often mean a scan; vendors sell a scan and call it a pentest. What each really is, what it costs in time, and a schedule that works for a product team.
Security
Securing AI agents in production: seven controls we never skip
An agent that can read your CRM and send emails is an employee with no judgement and infinite patience for a well-written attack. The controls that let us connect agents to real systems without losing sleep.